This post has been temporarily due to contradictory results. Once I get this sorted out with more careful testing, I will repost the findings. My apologies for any confusion.
Olympus E-410 & ZD 70-300 vs. Canon 5D & 100-400L
Sunday, December 30, 2007
Posted by Amin Labels: 100-400, 2x TC, 5D, Canon, E-410, Olympus, supertelephoto, teleconverter, ZD 70-300
4 comments:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Recent Posts
-
▼
2007
(79)
-
▼
December
(14)
- Olympus E-410 & ZD 70-300 vs. Canon 5D & 100-400L
- Giving Film a Chance.
- Canon Lenses on Full Frame vs Crop
- Corner sharpness: Four Thirds vs 35mm
- Panasonic DMC-L10 vs Olympus E-510 Per-Pixel Sharp...
- Canon vs Nikon: The Battle for 14mm
- Excellent GRD II vs GX100 Comparison at Ricoh Forum.
- Rumor: "Remarkably Small" Normal Prime for Olympus...
- My Dream Camera, Almost
- New Forum Focused on Compact Cameras with Inherent...
- Off Topic
- Ricoh GR Digital II Preview at LetsGoDigital
- Online 1Ds Mark III Review by Phil Holland
- Third-Party Lens Manufacturer Poll
-
▼
December
(14)
This is a very interesting comparison. Thanks for posting it.
I notice that you say that Rebel XTi and a 100-400L will deliver better image quality. It makes sense on three counts:
- The unimpressive performance of the Sigma APO formula
- The Canon having an effective focal-length of 640mm vs. the 600mm of the Olympus
- The price of this kit vs. the E510/E410 + 70-300
However, can you tell for sure that the Canon will have the upper hand without testing? If you have access to a 10MP 1.6x Canon body (XTi or 40D), this could be an even more interesting test.
Oren, thanks for your comment. I based that comment on the fact that I am familiar with how the 100-400L on the Rebel XTi (my brother's previous camera) performs relative to the same lens on my 5D. However, to confirm it, you are certainly correct that I should do the direct test. Regards, Amin
Olympus competition to Canon’s: the E-3, or better lenses. You can afford them as your Canon alternative is so outrageously expensive.
Yes, I wish I had an E-3 and 50-200 to compare. A pricier Oly kit may have made it less of a contest, but I still found it interesting that the $800 Oly kit outresolved the more expensive Canon kit on a distant subject.