Ten Recommended Compacts: Number 9

Want a great serious compact for $125?

Number 9 on the list is the Canon Powershot A590IS.


While much of the attention is on the sleek, compact ELPHs (now SD series), Canon has a long history of providing great functionality in the A series. For example, the A640 had the same sensor and lens as the G9, and in some ways more features, for significantly less money.

Let's see what the A590IS has to offer:
  • Full PSAM (program, shutter priority, aperture priority, manual exposure modes)
  • Manual focus mode
  • RAW capability with the freely available CHDK hack 
  • Pocketable, lightweight, and tough
  • Optical viewfinder, albeit small with terribly inaccurate framing, eliminates LCD lag, saves battery life, and for me provides a more stable holding position
  • Good LCD, relatively readable in both bright sunlight and dim lighting
  • Sharp, fast lens (f/2.6 at 35mm equivalent) with effective image stabilization (IS)
  • 35-140mm equivalent coverage with available Canon wide and tele adapters to expand coverage
  • Uses just two AA batteries with excellent battery life using rechargeables and average battery life (~200 shots) with off the shelf batteries
Controls and menus are standard Canon fare, which I happen to like.  It's no Ricoh, but everything is accessed easily enough.

What's not to like?
  • Moderate barrel distortion at the wide end
  • Average lens performance in the far corners of the frame
  • Average speed (slow) at telephoto (f/5.6)
  • Small sensor (1/2.5") with average dynamic range (though better than average ISO 400 noise handling)
The fact that the lens starts at 35mm equivalent rather than 28mm or 24mm will also be considered a downside to many readers of this blog.  I happen to love shooting at 35mm equivalent, so that negative is balanced by two positives for me: 1) As soon as I power on, it's at my preferred focal length; and 2) It's f/2.6 at 35mm.  A typical compact which offers f/2.8 max speed at 28mm equivalent will be f/3.2 max at 35mm, meaning 1/2 stop slower than the A590IS.

Overall, the A590IS is a tremendous value.  Image quality is great in good light, and thanks to a fast lens, effective IS, and good-for-size sensor technology, it's not bad in low light.  With full manual controls, an optical viewfinder, and added functionality (RAW and more) available through CHDK, the A590IS is a very serious compact for a bargain of a price.

The A590IS is currently selling for $125 at Amazon - A590IS at Amazon

The currently featured seller at Amazon is Adorama, from whom I have had good experiences buying.

Posted by Amin

Comments (13)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
improbable's avatar

improbable · 834 weeks ago

How useful is the CHDK raw file? For instance, can anyone summarise what steps are needed to turn it into something lightroom can digest, alongside all my other photos?

Am a big fan of raw files, but if you have to batch-convert to JPEG then it's only going to get tweaked to save a one-in-a-million shot, rather than to improve the good shots. In my life, at least.
3 replies · active 834 weeks ago
Basically, one has to batch process a folder of CHDK RAW files to DNG, which can then be imported into Lightroom. The apps to do this are freely available. Here is a nice example of the greater latitude of the CHDK RAW files: http://www.flickr.com/photos/phyrephox/3271947857... . Even if this RAW process is too cumbersome for you, it's worth taking a look at the other features of CHDK if you have an eligible camera: http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/FAQ#Q._What_does_the_C...
improbable's avatar

improbable · 834 weeks ago

OK thanks Amin. The batch conversion to DNG doesn't look too bad.
actually you dont need to convert. Since a few weeks CHDK can save DNGs directly.
Woo! My briefcase camera. It was a bargain at $155 when I bought it last summer and it's crazy cheap now, with some outlets carrying it at $110. I love this camera and take it everywhere. It's a tad ugly, but the value is just too good.
Excellent review. I am the proud owner of an A710 IS since 2007 (from US$ 120 in Amazon, now, but US$ 350, in Argentina, two years ago). I love the image quality, the 6x optical zoom, and its size. In Dpreview, they call it "the poor man's G7" :). And, of course, the CHDK. RAW files, intervalometer, bracketing, and even text files reader, for free.
Nice site. Greetings from La Plata, Argentina.
I agree that the A590 IS a great camera for the price. I have it and use it as a carry-everywhere compact. Have enhanced the feature set by adding a conversion lens adaptor on which I use UV/Polarising filters (even an old linear polariser works great). And through CHDk, have added Raw (CHDK now saves RAW as DNG files), live histogram, zoom (focal lengh) indicator and battery indicator. I haven't enjoyed using too many cameras as much as I enjoy using the A590 IS primarily because its so small yet powerful :-) It seems Canon has discontinued it and the cameras that have replaced it (A1000/A1100) have lost most of their serious, 'power' features and have started resembling 'barbie cams'. I can't figure out why Canon is destroying arguably the best yet line of digicams.
I am thoroughly enjoying these lists here and on TOP.

I have two questions. How long do the Canon A series take to write a raw file (from CHDK) to card. Is it a noticeable/frustrating delay?

Secondly (and hopefully not jumping the gun) how does it compare to the A650is? I realise this is "the best bang for the buck" but is there an increase in image quality as you move up.
Really enjoyed reading your post and thank you for your kind words regarding your good experiences purchasing photographic equipment from Adorama Camera - very much appreciated.

Sincerely

Helen Oster
Adorama Camera Customer Service Ambassador

helen.oster@adoramacamera.com
www.adorama.com
1 reply · active 834 weeks ago
Thanks Helen. Happy to recommend your business.
Judge, I had to upgrade my SD card to a Sandisk Extreme iii 2GB (writing on a standard card was way too slow). Writing of a RAW (DNG) + a Superfine M1 (5mp) jpeg takes about 5 seconds with the above mentioned card in A590 IS (pretty good, IMHO). But if in-camera flash is used, shot-to-shot times could become more than 10sec. I do not have A650 IS for comparison but yes, A590 RAWs are no match for G9 .CR2 RAW files (G9 and A650 share the same sensor, it seems). However, A590IS RAWs are much better than their JPEG counterparts. They are noisier but have much better detail and fewer artefacts. I could upload a couple of DNGs on Mediafire for you if you wish.
1 reply · active 834 weeks ago
The A650 has the same lens, sensor, and image processor as the G9. They should produce essentially identical image quality. The A590IS, with a smaller 1/2.5" sensor, cannot match the performance of the A650 with its 1/1.7" sensor. However, both cameras produce a very good file.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B0011ZCDKS...

Alot has changed over the last month-plus. I got a good price shortly after Canon took them off the shelves. Overstock was out of stock on May 19. I found one thru Amanzon. RedTagSale. $129+$40 (FREE SHIPPING). They're based on Coney Island mailing address, and the two weeks I had to wait for it to ship was like riding the Coney Island rollercoaster. Blindfolded. Many calls to check and many promises it would ship. Till it did. Upgraded to 2day.

I love this camera. I've taken good shots with Polariods to disposable panorama units. This one is a magician. With the manual controls (which I'm still learning) you can create such a wide variety of shots. Even just choosing the 'wrong' preset, like 'Beach' for a night/low light shot, or "Night Snapshot' for a beach or snow shot. Who needs Photoshop?!!

Thanks for this entry. I've seen a few writeups, and this one has the best focus for my level of expertise (not much). Very informative, and confirms a lot of what I've figured by using the camera for the last week.

Post a new comment

Comments by

 
Copyright 2007 | Andreas08v2 by GeckoandFly and TemplatesForYou | Design by Andreas Viklund
TFY Burajiru