Micro Four Thirds Camera Comparison Table

There seems to be some confusion about the basic differences amongst the four currently available Micro Four Thirds cameras. I've tried to summarize the major points in the table below. Unique strengths and weaknesses are highlighted.



In-body image stabilization
No
Yes
No
No
Multi-aspect ratio sensor
No
No
Yes
No
Smallest size
No
Yes
No
Yes
Integrated EVF (best in class)
Yes
No
Yes
No
Available kit including OVF
No
Yes
No
No
Available add-on EVF
Not applicable
No
Not applicable
Yes
Autofocus with all standard 4/3 lenses via adapter
No
Yes
No
No
Faster autofocus
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Articulated LCD
Yes
No
Yes
No
On-board flash
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
High res LCD
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Video
No
720p
Stereo
1080i
Stereo
720p
Mono
Kit zoom comments
-14-45mm
-Larger than Olympus
-Stabilized
-14-42mm
-Collapsible (small)
-Susceptible to blur at medium shutter speeds per Imaging-Resource
-14-140mm
-Video optimized
-Stabilized
-14-45mm
-Larger than Olympus
-Stabilized
Kit prime comments
Not available
17mm f/2.8 kit comes with OVF
Not available
20mm f/1.7 lens has strong early reviews
Anti-aliasing filter
Slightly weaker (more aliasing, better resolution)
Slightly stronger (less aliasing, lower resolution)
Slightly weaker (more aliasing, better resolution)
Slightly weaker (more aliasing, better resolution)
Control dials
One
Two
One
One
Art filters
No
Yes
No
No
Price


-17mm kit: $900 (includes OVF)

Posted by Amin

 
Copyright 2007 | Andreas08v2 by GeckoandFly and TemplatesForYou | Design by Andreas Viklund
TFY Burajiru