I admit to having a slight bias against Canon. Maybe it's the New Yorker in me, but I tend to root for the underdog. Despite this slight bias, I've purchased a lot of Canon cameras. More than any other brand. Thing is, Canon knows how to build a serious compact.
I'm impressed with the S90 build quality:
- Battery/SD door is firm and heavy duty
- Dial around lens has a good, smooth resistance with satisfying clicks at each adjustment
- Body is metal with no creaking or play
- Parts are tapered and well fitted without gaps, similar to an Apple laptop
- Flash extends and retracts without any sense of wobble
- Mode dial has the right amount of resistance and feels sturdy
- Buttons are all firm with good action
- On/off button is nicely recessed unlike *many* other compacts
- Good crisp feel, travel, and responsiveness to the shutter release
- Rear dial lacks resistance, but that has not been problematic in any way
Two small issues:
- The dial around the lens is plastic and has a touch of play.
- The LCD on my brand new S90 had a couple extremely fine/subtle scratches on it straight out of the box. This makes me wonder whether it scratches easily. Time will tell!
Did I mention that this camera is very compact? Here it is next to a GRD III. Please excuse the poor picture quality.
Canon Powershot S90 IS Initial Impressions: Build Quality
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Comments (12)

Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
Loading comments...
Comments by IntenseDebate
Posting anonymously.
Canon Powershot S90 IS Initial Impressions: Build Quality
2009-10-11T09:41:00-05:00
Amin
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Recent Posts
-
▼
2009
(119)
-
▼
October
(10)
- Adobe Lightroom 3 Beta Noise Reduction
- 'Best Camera' iPhone Application
- Serious Use of Compact Camera Images in Graphic De...
- Sunday Thoughts about Gear Obsession
- Real-life ISO 1600: Panasonic GH1, G1, and Canon S90
- Canon S90 Barrel Distortion
- Canon Powershot S90 IS Initial Impressions: Build ...
- Canon S90 Now In Stock at Some Stores
- Illustration: Multi-Aspect Four Thirds Versus Stan...
- Micro Four Thirds Camera Comparison Table
-
▼
October
(10)
Linh 36p · 808 weeks ago
I think the comparison is actually a testament to how small the GRD III is, heh.
amin 67p · 808 weeks ago
Regarding the GRD, as well made as the Canon is, the GRD feels that much nicer. The weight, size, and grip on the GRD are just perfect IMO. Controls on the GRD are also superior (IMO). More on that to come.
Spyro · 808 weeks ago
Not remembering the focus setting is a pain but only a software limitation. Maybe Canon will fix it later with a firmware update, like Panasonic did with their here today -gone toorrow update :)
amin 67p · 808 weeks ago
Spyro · 808 weeks ago
Bokehmon · 808 weeks ago
nemo66 · 808 weeks ago
And to be sincere, that´s what i already have done.
Bokehmon · 808 weeks ago
Enche · 807 weeks ago
However, I appreciate the two dials (2 round dials - lens + back) this will make changing setting blazingly fast.
amin 67p · 807 weeks ago
gduran · 793 weeks ago
shandrew 11p · 789 weeks ago
My S90 takes terrific photos and has excellent controls. However, I found the build quality to be worse than expected, especially for a $400+ compact. My previous pocket camera was a Canon SD200 (~$300, 2005), which felt more solid and indestructible. In contrast, the S90 creaks in some spots and the convex buttons don't have as good of a tactile feel as the concave buttons on the SD200. The directional buttons on the dial feel cheap.The on/off button is difficult to distinguish from the ring-function button. On the good side, the shutter button (the most important!) is perfect on the S90.
The good news is that the average build quality doesn't detract from the awesome photos the camera can take and probably has minimal correlation to how durable the S90 will be.