The market release of Sigma’s DP1 moves single focal length lenses back into the spotlight. The DP1 isn’t the first among modern digital compacts equipped with a 28mm equivalent prime lens; Ricoh introduced its 28mm, fixed focal length GRD in 2005.
Olympus’ new pancake lens has an equivalent focal length of 50mm. This is quite a bit narrower than the 28mm of the DP1 and GRD. 50mm is considered a “normal” lens; one which is thought to have the same angle of view as human eyesight. I’m speculating, but I wouldn’t be surprised if a Sigma DP2, or another large sensor compact from a competitor, doesn’t also have an integrated normal lens.
The Zuiko 25mm f/2.8 pancake lens has a diameter of 64mm, so it would almost fit the 60mm height of the current DP1 body. Therefore it seems that a 4/3 sensor compact with a 50mm equivalent f/2.8 lens is possible.
Below are scaled front views of both the DP1 and the Zuiko 25mm f/2.8 lens.
To get a feeling for working with normal prime lenses, I purchased a Nikkor 35mm f/2 lens for my Nikon D300. That yields an equivalent focal length of 52.5mm. My first impressions are that photographing with it is a lot less restrictive than I had imagined considering that my experience to date is solely with zoom lenses. In time I think I will start to see and frame photos with that particular focal length in mind.
Above: at a hefty 1200 grams this is still not compact, although certainly serious!
I’m going to be using the prime lens exclusively for the next few weeks. After that time, I hope to have a better understanding of whether to invest in a combination like the E-420 plus Zuiko 25mm lens.
Just supposing you had to take all your photos with only one prime lens, what focal length would it be? Would you find working with a prime lens restrictive? If I could figure that out, it would make deciding on any future fixed focal length cameras that much simpler. I’m hoping that the DP1 will be followed by other cameras in this class and, given the constraints of placing a large sensor in a compact body, it’s likely that at least some will have prime lenses.
The Year of the Prime
Friday, March 14, 2008
4 comments:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Recent Posts
-
▼
2008
(254)
-
▼
March
(37)
- Ricoh GRDII Firmware 2.0 issue
- New Ricoh GX100 review
- Canon 5D and Sigma DP1 Comparison at f/8 and ISO 200
- Japanese DP1 Review and Sample Images
- PhotoReview Posts Review of the Sigma DP1
- The Challenge of the Small Sensor
- New Spring Galleries for Five Serious Compacts at ...
- Serious Canon Compacts, Then and Now
- Luminous Landscape Ricoh GX100 online
- Ricoh GX100 review diary
- Can We Feature Your Photo on the Serious Compacts ...
- DPReviewer Reveals Priority List for Compact Reviews
- Fuji F100fd - It's Compact, but is it Serious? Par...
- Fuji F100fd - It's Compact, but is it Serious? Par...
- Two Potential Solutions for Shallow Depth of Field...
- Sigma DP1 test on PopPhoto.com
- Panasonic FX500: Quite a Serious Ultra Compact
- Said Karlsson's Impressions of the Sigma DP1
- Fuji F100fd - It's Compact, but is it Serious? Par...
- A Rainy Day in Amsterdam
- Serious Compacts Flickr Group Created
- Euyoung's Six-Part Sigma DP1 Review
- Featured Artist: Mitchell Kanashkevich
- Luminous Landscape announces Ricoh GX100 review
- The Year of the Prime
- Two New Ricoh Reviews on the "Mainstream" Review S...
- Zeiss Ikon Review on TOP
- Amin Foto Renamed to Serious Compacts
- Public Service Message Re: Amazon DP1 Pre-Order
- Nik Software Viveza
- Update on the DP1 Shootout
- Two Sigma DP1 Pro User Reviews Posted
- Sigma DP1 Dynamic Range
- Shrinking Gap in Size Between DSLRs and Compacts
- Insights into Future Advanced Compacts from Panasonic
- Rytterfalk.com - One Day at a Time with the Sigma DP1
- More Sigma DP Series Compacts Coming this Year?
-
▼
March
(37)
I hadn't really thought about this before, but I think you're absolutely right about the potential DP1 effect on the market. Current sensor technology makes it difficult to generate compact, large sensor cameras, so it is natural that primes would be part of the answer. As I wrote a while back, I really enjoy working with primes. In fact, I don't currently own a zoom lens aside from the Canon 100-400mm lens. These days I most often walk around with an Olympus OM-2N and OM 40mm f/2 (pancake). I particularly enjoy the wide-normal field of view.
As an aside, your very serious Nikon D300/prime combo brings to mind the fact that "compact" is truly a relative concept. Compare that combo to a D3 with a 24-70/2.8 zoom, and it will feel rather compact!
Thanks for pointing that out, Amin. Now my D300 feels a little less heavy! I really would have preferred at more compact DSLR. Unfortunately, the features I'm looking for don't seem to be present in the smaller models which are usually geared towards the "consumer" market. A compact DSLR with all the semi-professional features like a 100% viewfinder with grid overlay, advanced focus and metering as well that superb screen, would be great.
I enjoyed reading your article on primes. I'm very pleased with the 35mm f/2 prime, but I'm looking for a wider prime to complement it. Something in the range of your favourite focal length.
Unfortunately a 28mm equivalent prime is difficult to find. There is the Nikkor 20mm f/2.8, but that lens is supposed to be less ideal for digital than it was for film.
I don't know of any other reasonably priced options. Other than needing a lens that covers the wide end, I'm quite willing to sell my 18-200VR.
It is interesting that smaller DSLRs are, as you say, geared towards the consumer market, with cheaper materials and less functionality. I think we'll see movement away from this over time. The Olympus E-420 is getting quite a bit of attention from"high-end" DSLR owners.
Yes yes yes...primes. I love them. Too many people forget the merit of having a prime over a zoom.
Zoom are very useful, but having just one focal length really adds to your creativity and makes you learn how to better frame a shot.
I love my 30mm on my SD14 and gonna love the 16.6 on my DP1 whenever I can afford it!
Year of the Rat=Year of the Prime!