I'm often complaining about the megapixel race. For example I had wished that the Canon 5D mark II had only had 14MP instead of 21, and thus could have had even better low-light performance. And the same goes for recent Canon compacts. But there's a case to be made for the opposite viewpoint.
This article is about DSLRs, but the same principles applies to compact cameras. It seems that higher resolution will compensate for higher noise, so it will even out because the total light gathering area of the sensor is the same. And then you can always downsample the higher resolution image, but you can't invent data from the lower resolution image.
Of course, if you never intend to make prints bigger than, say, 8x10" (20x25cms), then 6MP will do you. But try and find a 6MP camera today.
Higher resolution and noise
Saturday, November 22, 2008
Higher resolution and noise
2008-11-22T10:37:00-05:00
Eolake Stobblehouse
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Recent Posts
-
▼
2008
(254)
-
▼
November
(13)
- Panasonic G1 Review at The Luminous Landscape
- Adapting Lenses to Micro Four Thirds
- Canon Powershot G10 review and Adobe Raw support
- Higher resolution and noise
- Future of compacts
- Canon G10 - Panasonic LX3 High ISO Comparison
- Panasonic LX3 Sensor Analysis by Emil Martinec
- Thom Hogan - Canon G10 vs Panasonic LX3 vs Nikon P...
- Panasonic LX3 Review at DPReview
- Serious Compacts Shootout Poll Results
- Laurence Kim - Panasonic LX3: Parts 2 and 3 Online
- Panasonic G1 Review Posted at DCRP
- Panasonic G1 Now In Stock at Amazon
-
▼
November
(13)